Comments to the video “Louis Pasteur vs Robert Koch: The History of Germ Theory” by Patrick Kelly.
German Supreme Court: insufficient evidence of Measles virus — German Supreme Court upholds biologist’s (reward-pending) claim that scientific proof showing existence of Measles Virus does not exist in one study — [url]https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/39817/did-germanys-supreme-court-rule-that-the-measles-virus-didnt-exist[/url] gives a fuller explanation. [url]https://covid19reader.com[/url] website presents succinct info as does [url]https://www.evincer.org/evidence/german-court-found-no-evidence-of-measles-virus[/url].
It should also be mentioned and explored that — per Dr Tom Cowan, Drs Mark and Samantha Bailey, Dr Andrew Kaufman and no doubt others — there is no literature which identifies the true isolation of any “viral” contagious pathogen — and thus no scientific causal metric evidenced, and thus no possibility for any scientifically valid ‘cure’ or prevention attributed to vaccination. The “anti-vaxxer” stance apparently has scientific merit in the question: if no virus has ever been isolated, what is being purportedly innoculated against in the injections?
Neuresthenia, particularly regarding the upsurge of Freud. Neuresthenia was the word attributed to nerve sensitivity to electrical exposure, particularly RF radiation (spark-gap transmitters). This is covered in the book by Arthur Firstenberg called INVISIBLE RAINBOW which directly correlates “disease outbreaks” with mass electrification events to evidence causality. This lends credence to the new cellphone system as causal to pandemic and is particularly ominous in regards to the tens of thousands of orbiting powerful RF blasters in the ELON MUSK project called STARLINK, one of several projects already underway. Note the Italian court case which found the Vatican liable for causing a ‘cancer cluster outbreak’ near its powerful RF transmitters of “Vatican Radio” — this victory of scientific understanding has been widely reported except inside USA which rabidly has over 300,000 cellphone towers per the antennasearch portal to the FCC RF radiator database. [Another suggestion — Jesuit pursuit called radiesthesia (dowsing).]
What should also be mentioned is the intense role of the [Roman] Catholic church and other religious agendas. Blood and bloodline pedigree were (and remain) among the most deeply revered interests.
Blood-letting and mercury exposure were no doubt among the most major system jolts that could be applied, pursuant Terrain Theory. Don’t dismiss prematurely or with unwise prejudice as is too often done.
VATICAN RADIO TRANSMITTERS CAUSE CANCER — [url]https://duckduckgo.com/?q=vatican+radio%2C+cancer[/url] — widely reported except inside USA which rabidly has over 300,000 cellphone towers per the antennasearch portal to the FCC RF radiator database.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCVnOb6VXmg&t=6s
German supreme court: insufficient evidence of measles virus
[url]https://www.evincer.org/evidence/german-court-found-no-evidence-of-measles-virus[/url]
Edited by @jovian
Dispute over a competition, not necessarily evidence I went through both court judgments, and while there was some useful collateral info I collected along the way (potential ‘Yes’ evidence), this whole episode seems to have revolved almost entirely around a dispute over a prize money for a competition, rather than evidence about the existence of measles.
My very brief summary:
++ Lanka advertised a competition giving 100K Euros to anyone who could prove the existence of the measles virus
++ A doctor in training submitted 6 published papers which he claimed proved the existence of measles
++ Lanka declined to pay, stating these were not new works, did not prove the existence of measles, were not scientifically rigorous enough, etc
++ The trainee doctor took the matter to court over Lanka’s refusal to pay
++ Lanka loses first court case. Ordered to pay the prize money
++ Lanka appeals and is successful.
HOWEVER, the appeal was successful on the basis of the criteria Lanka set, that in the words of the court, “The awarded amount could only have been earned if the circumstances to be proven had all been presented in a self-contained work.”
Because the trainee doctor submitted a conglomeration of old studies, rather than a new study that proved the existence of the measles virus all in one self-contained work, the prize money wasn’t awarded.
Understandably, Lanka is using this to claim that measles doesn’t exist (and vaccination is wrong), but I’m not sure there is any actual evidence to post here.
…a few of the papers submitted by the trainee doctor can probably be added to the ‘Yes’ debate…
—
Stephan Lanka Court Documents I think it’s mainly a legal issue of did the applicant meet the burden set out by Lanka (and to some extent, what was that burden).
Here are the two judgments.
The first one awarded the money to the person who submitted the evidence.
[url]http://lrbw.juris.de/cgi-bin/laender_rechtsprechung/document.py?Gericht=bw&GerichtAuswahl=Landgerichte&Art=en&sid=b9661a61381354aad69ab3c54d8bb2d4&Sort=1&nr=19277&pos=0&anz=1[/url]
The second higher court overturned the decision.
[url]http://lrbw.juris.de/cgi-bin/laender_rechtsprechung/document.py?Gericht=bw&GerichtAuswahl=Oberlandesgerichte&Art=en&sid=46bf3db2df690aba6e4874acafaf45b6&nr=20705&pos=0&anz=1[/url]