BioMedical Implants and References for Implant Technologies

Chapter 72 of the McGraw-Hill Homeland Security Handbook addresses the important issue of the ideological differences between the United States and al-Qaida and the necessity to win the war of ideas. This chapter outlines the ideology promulgated by al-Qaida and associated terrorist groups. It examines recent attempts by the United States to combat al-Qaida’s worldview and compares this effort with America’s global propaganda campaign against the Soviet Union. The chapter concludes with some preliminary ideas about waging an effective counterpropaganda campaign against al-Qaida, including potential themes and approaches.

http://www.skizit.biz/2015/03/30/references-for-implant-technologies/

REFERENCES FOR IMPLANT TECHNOLOGIES
Posted on 30 March, 2015 by Skizit
In General:

1. Wireless Medical Technologies: Navigating Government Regulation in The New Medical Age, Updated 2013, Terry G. Mahn, Chair of Fish’s Regulatory & Government Affairs

Cellphones are being synched by manufacturers all over the world, although FCC regulations say only healthcare professionals are allowed to “operate” the system or “stimulate implant” use.

2. Applications of Smartphones for Ubiquitous Health Monitoring and Wellbeing Management, and On the Capability of Smartphones to Perform as Communication Gateways in Medical Wireless Personal Area Networks

3. MOST IMPORTANT: An Introduction to New Technologies, Part 1, Patrick Redmond; http://www.michaeljournal.org/newtechno.htm

4. Maximum pain is aim of new US weapon (names of doctors who developed the pain system); http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7077#.U5p8YHacehc A research contract between the Office of Naval Research and the University of Florida in Gainesville, US, is entitled “Sensory consequences of electromagnetic pulses emitted by laser induced plasmas”. It concerns so-called Pulsed Energy Projectiles (PEPs), which fire a laser pulse that generates a burst of expanding plasma when it hits something solid, like a person (New Scientist print edition, 12 October 2002). PEPs produced “pain and temporary paralysis”. This appears to be the result of an electromagnetic pulse produced by the expanding plasma which triggers impulses in nerve cells. Researchers at the University of Central Florida in Orlando, aims to optimise this effect. The idea is to work out how to generate a pulse which triggers pain neurons without damaging tissue for “optimal pulse parameters to evoke peak nociceptor activation” – in other words, cause the maximum pain possible. Responsible parties: Martin Richardson, a laser expert at the University of Central Florida, US and Brian Cooper, an expert in dental pain at the University of Florida- $500,000-plus grant.
John Wood of University College London, UK, an expert in how the brain perceives pain, says “It could be used for torture,” he says, “the [researchers] must be aware of this.” The long-term harm” “Persistent pain can result from a range of supposedly non-destructive stimuli which nevertheless change the functioning of the nervous system,” Amanda Williams.

5. Good technology used to cause pain:

Wireless Microstimulators, David S. Freedman, Mesut Sahin, PhD and Bruce Towe (stimulate nerves for pain) and Neural Dust: An Ultrasonic, Low Power Solution for Chronic Brain-Machine Interfaces by Dongjin Seo, Carmena et al, July 2003

6. From Textbook: Reliable and Energy Efficient Network Protocols for Wireless body Area Networks, Benoit Latri, Universiteit Gent, 2007-2008, Introduction-Chapter 3

and Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN) for Medical Applications, by Jamil Y. Khan and Mehmet R. Yuce, University of Newcastle, Australia

7. Computer Technology used for Implants:

A Comprehensive Survey of MAC Protocols for Wireless Body Area Networks, by A. Rahim et al.

8. SATELLITES ARE DEFINITELY PART OF THE SYSTEM:

Wireless Body area Network Combined with Satellite Communication for Remote Medical and Healthcare Applications, Huan-Ban Li, Takashi Takahashi

9. THE FUTURE OF IMPLANTED BANS:

From BAN to AMI-BAN: micro and nano technologies in future Body Area Networks

10. EFFECTS OF LONG TERM USE:

Effects of Radiation and SAR from Wireless Implanted Medical Devices on the Human Body, by Pichitpong Soontornpipit PhD, 2012

10. BRAIN CONTROL CAN BE DONE REMOTELY (some people don’t believe):

Operating the Brain by Remote Control by Monty Henry re Dr. William J. Tyler, Arizona State University

11. ULTRASOUND IS USED TO STIMULATE SOME IMPLANTS:

POSER: Parametric Orchestral Sonification of EEG in Real-Time for the Self-Regulation of Brain States

12. Humann++: Autonomous Wireless Sensors for Body Area Networks, IMEC, Belgium

13. A Review of Real-Time EEG Sonification Research

14. Acoustic Intra-Body Data Transmission by Yuri Okunev, Michael Arneson, https://www.google.com/search?q=Acoustic+Intra-Body+Data+Transmission+by+Yuri+Okunev&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

15. Medical Implant Communications Service Frequency Table http://www.csgnetwork.com/micsfreqtable.html

16. What the FCC’s new rules mean for wireless body sensors by Robert D. Primosch, et al.; http://www.imedicalapps.com/2015/02/fcc-wirless-body-sensors/

17. People Tracking Using Anonymous Binary Sensors

18. Effects of Radiation and SAR from Wireless Implanted Medical Devices on the Human Body

Visited 1 times, 1 visit(s) today

Leave a Comment