The Measles Myth
To this moment, no scientific proof exists to show any measles “virus” exists at all. THE ENTIRE MEASLES VIRUS THING IS A TOTAL SHAM. THE VIRUS THEORY REMAINS TOTALLY UNPROVEN, EVER, ANYWHERE, BY ANYONE, EVER. IT IS ALL A 100% TOTAL SHAM.
Thanks to Dr Sam, husband mark and virus mania I declined the medical intervention, and I have never regretted that decision.
I must thank my mother for not trusting doctors, I never got vaccinated , ever! Now 64.
Most every child had measles when I was growing up and I never heard of anyone dying from having measles.
The parents of the child that passed away recently in Texas were interviewed on the CHD TV website. She didn’t die from measles like the media said. She developed bacterial pneumonia and wasn’t given the correct treatment. They refused to give her water or steroids to help her breathing and she was sedated and put on a ventilator until she passed away.
I’m in Alberta watching the fear mongering start.
Trascript
0:00
sometimes I get asked if I'm on the war
0:02
path to go through all the alleged
0:04
viruses one by one and show that they
0:07
don't exist while it sounds like fun I'm
0:09
not sure that it is required because the
0:11
familiar pattern starts to appear in
0:13
virology with regards to lack of valid
0:16
control experiments failure to
0:18
demonstrate the full characteristics of
0:20
the alleged particles and the complete
0:23
failure to show that they can cause
0:25
disease someone who has been calling out
0:28
the questionable evidence regarding the
0:31
existence of pathogenic viruses for much
0:33
longer than me is German microbiologist
0:36
Dr Stefan Linker Dr Linka hit the
0:38
headlines in 2015 when the corporate
0:40
media smeared him by reporting that he
0:43
had foolishly offered
0:45
€100,000 to anyone that could prove the
0:47
existence of the measles virus how could
0:50
anyone be so crazy they alleged and to
0:52
this day some of these sites continue to
0:55
imply that Dr Lano was proven wrong and
0:57
lost his money but is that what really
1:01
[Music]
1:03
happened Dr Lanka is a major thorn in
1:06
the sign for parts of the medical
1:07
establishment and pharmaceutical
1:09
industry he does the experiments that
1:12
nobody else has been doing especially
1:14
control experiments in virology he has
1:17
shown that cytopathic effects one of the
1:19
ways virologists claim proof of a virus
1:22
can be generated in a test tube by
1:24
simply stressing the cells through the
1:26
technique itself that is through the
1:28
addition of substances such as
1:30
antibiotics and passaging of the culture
1:33
however to this day these false proxies
1:35
continue to be presented as evidence of
1:37
viruses Dr Lan has also pointed out the
1:40
problems of shotgun and metagenomic
1:43
sequencing techniques to create alleged
1:45
genomes particularly in virology Stefan
1:48
has his own exuberant style and
1:50
discusses some of the issues related to
1:52
this here and the most important thing
1:55
is to know from the nucleid acid which
1:58
they had in their hand they could not
2:00
create a genome so they multiplied it
2:04
with PCR in a such a dirty way with a
2:08
lot of cycles and a lot of Cycles always
2:10
mean dirty a lot of new sequences are
2:14
produced which in reality are not there
2:16
and with this artificially produced uh
2:20
nucle acid with even then they could not
2:23
come up with a genome so they took some
2:25
sequences made this assembly are some of
2:29
them fit here some of them fit there and
2:32
uh so then we put all those things to a
2:35
given Genome of a Corona virus and even
2:38
then this the thing was not ready and
2:41
the Second Step what they are doing they
2:43
are producing artificial short sequences
2:47
of nucleate acid called primer used in
2:50
the PCR and they construct in such a
2:53
high number that the sequences
2:55
artificially created on their own are
2:59
20% % of the genome right and then only
3:03
after this what they are calling deep
3:05
metag genomic sequencing they come up
3:08
with with a genome so to put it short
3:11
what they have in reality in their test
3:13
tubes right they uh they have nothing in
3:18
any case it was in 2011 that Dr Lano was
3:21
concerned about the basis of the measles
3:24
vaccine and proposals to mandate the
3:26
vaccine for children in Germany he
3:29
concluded that the best way to draw
3:31
attention to the matter would be to get
3:33
some public attention on the science as
3:35
to whether the virus even existed in the
3:38
first place and was the causative agent
3:40
of the disease so he offered a reward of
3:44
€100,000 to anyone who could prove the
3:47
existence and the size of the measles
3:49
virus by means of a scientific
3:51
publication believing that he had
3:53
collated the required proof physician
3:55
David Bon submitted six Publications but
3:59
as Dr Lang had specified a single
4:01
publication he responded that the
4:03
conditions of his offer had not been
4:05
fulfilled Dr Bens then sued laner and in
4:08
March 2015 the ravensburg land Court one
4:11
of the lower courts in Germany ruled
4:13
that Lena had to pay him the 100,000 EUR
4:16
plus interest this this was German
4:19
biologist Stefan Lanka I love the story
4:22
he offered €100,000 for proof that
4:24
measles exist and a court made him pay
4:27
now Dr Lincoln knew that this was a
4:29
likely outcome in the lower court which
4:31
doesn't rely on Expert Witnesses so he
4:34
appealed against this ruling and put the
4:37
case before the stutgart higher Regional
4:39
Court in February
4:40
2016 where he won Dr Bens appealed
4:44
against this ruling to the highest court
4:46
in Germany but the appeal was dismissed
4:48
in December 2016 and Lanka safely kept
4:51
his money
5:10
thanks to my friend JM at JM Warfare for
5:12
putting together that video since that
5:15
time I have seen various attempts by the
5:17
media to claim that Dr laner only won
5:20
the case on a technicality or semantic
5:23
formulation rather than on scientific
5:25
Merit I suspect this is because it is
5:28
another embarrassment for the medical
5:29
system and vaccinologists so let's have
5:32
a look at the papers that were presented
5:34
in court and decide for ourselves
5:37
whether there is any evidence that the
5:39
meil virus exists paper number one is a
5:42
paper that I've talked about previously
5:44
it's the 1954 paper by Enders and
5:46
Peebles that resurrected virology and
5:49
their ongoing problems concerning
5:51
isolating any viruses from humans and
5:53
this experiment samples from patients
5:55
that had a clinical diagnosis of measles
5:57
were added to tissue cultures and then
6:00
cytopathic effects were observed that is
6:02
the cells appeared diseased and some
6:05
died so why was this rejected as
6:08
evidence Enders didn't perform any
6:11
control experiments and has been
6:13
demonstrated by Lan himself you can get
6:15
the same effects without adding patient
6:17
samples Enders and pees did warn in
6:19
their paper that additional observations
6:22
however will be required before it can
6:24
be confidently asserted that dermal
6:26
epithelial cells are specifically
6:28
attacked by these virus es and it must
6:31
be borne in mind that cytopathic effects
6:33
which superficially resemble those
6:35
resulting from infection by the measles
6:37
agents may possibly be induced by
6:40
unknown factors unfortunately the
6:43
warnings were swept aside and
6:45
virologists to this day continue to use
6:47
this unscientific method the second
6:49
paper presented was studies on measles
6:52
virus and monkey kidney tissue cultures
6:53
from 1958 however this was simply
6:56
another cell culture experiment with
6:58
observed cytopathic effects so like the
7:00
first paper it does not constitute any
7:02
evidence of a virus existing the third
7:04
paper was electromicroscopy of meal's
7:07
virus replication published in 1969 by
7:10
this time the authors obtained lots of
7:12
pictures of particles inside cells and
7:15
claimed they were measles viruses but
7:17
they provided no evidence that these
7:19
particles were viruses and relied on
7:21
arbitrary declarations the particles
7:24
themselves were not shown in any way to
7:26
be infectious or disease causing the
7:29
fourth paper was the molecular length of
7:31
meil virus RNA and the structural
7:34
organization of measel nucleo capsids
7:36
published in 1984 in this experiment the
7:39
authors produced images of purified
7:41
particles which they seed were masil
7:44
viruses however as you may have guessed
7:47
like the previous paper how is it known
7:49
that these are viruses and can cause
7:51
disease they can't make this
7:53
determination because no clinical
7:55
experiments were performed to show that
7:57
the particles did anything to a
7:59
potential host the fifth paper was
8:02
structure transcription and replication
8:04
of measles virus published in 1995 this
8:07
was a consensus review in which the
8:09
authors purport to describe the measles
8:11
virus genome however this was based on
8:15
detecting genetic fragments in test
8:17
tubes and assembling them into a
8:19
hypothetical model it was not
8:21
established that the computer generated
8:23
sequence exists in nature all the
8:26
sequences were even viral in origin the
8:28
last paper was analysis of morphology
8:31
and infectivity of meil virus particles
8:34
published in 2007 this one is probably
8:37
the funniest the authors did a tissue
8:39
Culture by mixing an alleged meil virus
8:42
sample with Vero cells the abnormal
8:45
monkey kidney cell line that produces
8:47
locks of action in the test tube then
8:49
they took electron micrographs and
8:50
claimed that the particles that ranged
8:52
in size by a factor of 20 we viruses
8:56
this seems a little odd for something
8:58
that is supposed to make make faithful
9:00
replicants of itself in any case they
9:03
provided no evidence that the particles
9:05
were able to cause disease and even
9:07
worse performed no control experiment
9:11
for what are known to be non-specific
9:12
cell reactions in a test tube in summary
9:15
I don't think Dr Lanka won the case on
9:17
just a technicality as even altogether
9:20
the six papers do not show that a
9:22
measles virus exists at the court
9:24
proceedings Professor Andreas podilsky
9:27
head of the Department of medical mic
9:29
mology and biology in rotto suggested
9:32
that taken all together they could
9:35
perhaps be considered to provide
9:37
evidence of the measles virus but then
9:39
he contradicted himself by admitting
9:41
that with regards to the six presented
9:43
papers none of the authors had conducted
9:46
any controlled experiments following
9:48
internationally defined rules and
9:51
principles of good scientific practice
9:53
it's unclear to me how combining six
9:56
unscientific papers would produce a
9:59
scientific result so this is a sorry
10:01
state of affairs with regards to the
10:03
existence of the measles virus and if
10:05
you are wondering whether there are
10:07
better papers that could have been put
10:09
forward it seems unlikely while there
10:12
are tens of thousands of published
10:14
papers purporting to relate to the
10:16
measles virus most of them simply assume
10:20
that the virus exists and judging by the
10:22
way virologists are operating I don't
10:24
think many of them are likely to make
10:26
any attempts to address the existence
10:28
issue and the near future however
10:31
despite Stefan Linker exposing this in
10:33
such a public way soon afterwards the
10:36
German Parliament passed into law the
10:38
measles protection act to make
10:40
injections mandatory for children and
10:42
staff in kindergartens and schools
10:44
medical facilities and Community
10:47
facilities from March 2020 follow the
10:50
science right but if a virus doesn't
10:53
cause meils what does many diseases in
10:57
the past were thought to be du to
10:59
viruses or infectious agents for example
11:02
pelra was originally considered to be
11:05
spread by a virus when it is actually
11:07
caused by a deficiency in niin vitamin
11:10
B3 vitamin A deficiency has been
11:12
implicated in the role of measles
11:14
especially in the treatment of the
11:16
disease but then because everyone is
11:18
looking through the virus lens
11:20
conclusions are made to fit unproven
11:22
claims such as acute measles
11:25
precipitates vitamin A deficiency by
11:27
depleting vitamin A stores and inreasing
11:29
its utilization so the pattern continues
11:32
where we are told a virus causes a
11:34
particular disease even though there is
11:36
no evidential proof of the virus and
11:39
then we have these more bili form rashes
11:41
which look just like measles but result
11:45
from all sorts of things that are not
11:47
viruses we're told in fact they are the
11:49
most common type of prescription drug
11:51
rash that we see again it raises the
11:54
problems of what measles is if these are
11:57
non-specific findings over time deaths
12:00
from diseases such as measles have
12:01
fallen dramatically as standards of
12:04
living have improved incredibly since
12:06
the early 1900s despite claims that are
12:09
widely touted the introduction of
12:11
measles vaccines cannot be said to have
12:14
been the reason for these improvements
12:16
and deaths and injuries are what we are
12:19
trying to prevent not meaningless case
12:22
numbers as promoted by disingenuous
12:24
sites such as Wikipedia while we do see
12:27
clusters of measel cases in unvaccinated
12:29
communities these also happen to be
12:32
people exposed to the same environmental
12:34
conditions which are often suboptimal
12:38
why could nutritional deficiencies not
12:40
be considered as a cause of this disease
12:42
and also relate to the severity of cases
12:46
in any case the unproven virus Theory
12:48
and subsequent vaccines have likely
12:50
hindered our progress towards better
12:52
understanding of health and yes they can
12:55
make vaccines without a virus existing
12:58
as like the experiments seen they just
12:59
claim the proteins and genetic fragments
13:02
they work with in the test tubes are the
13:04
virus as a last note I thought I would
13:07
mention that Stefan and myself are both
13:10
influenced by the same group when we set
13:12
down the path of investigating the
13:14
existence of viruses and that's the
13:17
Perth group the Australian tpg are a
13:20
Powerhouse team that have rattled the
13:22
HIV establishment for several decades
13:24
their website contains devastating
13:26
analyses of the HIV Theory including
13:29
material that the big Pharma controlled
13:30
medical journals won't publish they have
13:33
shown us the way to critique the
13:36
methodologies of modern virologists and
13:38
many of us are standing on their
13:40
shoulders now if you want to delve into
13:43
some of the heavier literature regarding
13:45
the existence of HIV make sure you check
13:48
out their website we also borrow from
13:50
the work of the Perth group and provide
13:52
an analysis of HIV Theory suitable for a
13:55
general audience in virus Mania
14:03
[Music]
14:08
to help sustain my channel in this time
14:10
of censorship please support my work on
14:12
subscribe star link is in the
14:15
description so that we don't lose touch
14:18
please find me at Dr samb bailey.com and
14:21
sign up for my free newsletter