Follow the Yellow Vaccine Road
Jesuit Created & Controlled Microsoft Patent WO2020060606A1 [666, 2020] ‘Cryptocurrency System Using Body Activity Data’
RFK Jr — Bill Gates’ Coronavirus Vaccine Will Pay Out BILLIONS in Profits to Dr. Fauci’s NIAID — See Microchip currency patent / Microsoft
19 Coronavirus patents
$3.7M grant from NIAID/Fauci in 2014 to Wuhan
Nature magazine boasting of new Wuhan biowar lab in 2017
Harvard prof Liever / China / virus-swap scandal
Dr Judy Mikovits’ AIDS research commandeered by NIH/Fauci
Fauci withholds WHO documents; Fauci sued by Judicial Watch to produce withheld records
The blog post titled “Follow the Yellow Vaccine Road,” published on January 5, 2025, on wp.toxi.com, presents several claims and references concerning vaccines, patents, and public health figures. Here’s an analysis of the key points mentioned:
- Microsoft Patent WO2020060606A1: The post references a Microsoft patent numbered WO2020060606A1, suggesting a connection to the number “666” and the year 2020. This patent, titled “Cryptocurrency System Using Body Activity Data,” describes a system where human body activity associated with tasks provided to a user can be used in a mining process of a cryptocurrency system. The number “666” appears to be coincidental, as patent numbers are sequential and not chosen for symbolic reasons. There is no evidence to suggest that this patent is related to vaccines or any form of microchipping individuals.
- Claims Involving Dr. Anthony Fauci and NIAID:
- Grant to Wuhan: The post mentions a $3.7 million grant from NIAID, led by Dr. Anthony Fauci, in 2014 to Wuhan. It’s documented that NIAID provided funding to EcoHealth Alliance, which collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology on coronavirus research. This funding aimed to study potential pandemics and was not intended for bioweapon development.
- Judicial Watch Lawsuit: The post references a lawsuit by Judicial Watch against Dr. Fauci for withholding documents. Judicial Watch, a government watchdog group, has filed lawsuits seeking the release of documents related to various government activities, including those involving Dr. Fauci and NIAID. Such legal actions are part of efforts to ensure transparency and do not inherently indicate wrongdoing.
- Dr. Judy Mikovits’ Research: The post mentions Dr. Judy Mikovits, claiming her AIDS research was commandeered by NIH/Fauci. Dr. Mikovits is a former researcher who has made controversial claims about vaccines and diseases. Her assertions have been widely discredited by the scientific community, and there is no credible evidence supporting the claim that her research was improperly taken over by NIH or Dr. Fauci.
- Harvard Professor Charles Lieber: The post alludes to a “Harvard prof Liever” involved in a “virus-swap scandal.” This likely refers to Dr. Charles Lieber, a Harvard professor who was arrested in early 2020 for making false statements about his affiliation with China’s Thousand Talents Program and his financial ties to Chinese institutions. However, his case is unrelated to any “virus-swap” or the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Claims: The post cites Robert F. Kennedy Jr., suggesting that Bill Gates’ coronavirus vaccine would yield significant profits for Dr. Fauci’s NIAID. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is known for his anti-vaccine stance and has made numerous unsubstantiated claims regarding vaccines. There is no credible evidence to support the assertion that NIAID or Dr. Fauci would profit from vaccine distribution.
- COVID-19 Vaccine Patents: The post mentions “19 Coronavirus patents.” It’s common for multiple patents to exist related to various aspects of vaccine development, including methods, compositions, and technologies. The existence of such patents reflects the extensive research and innovation in the field and does not imply any conspiracy.
Conclusion: The blog post aggregates various claims and conspiracy theories that have been circulating, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Many of these claims lack credible evidence and have been debunked by experts and fact-checking organizations. It’s essential to approach such information critically and consult reliable sources when evaluating the validity of such assertions.
